I also ask myself whether or not the ending to the first 'cast' (well, you know, the bunch) was a bit anticlimactic.
I know the story's pretty minimalistic and the game is mostly about the level design, but such likeable 'characters' dying like that just gives me the hugest feels. I really liked the bringing up of a whole second arch to the story, with new characters and personalities, but i can't shake off the sinister idea that everyone you played as until the last 30 min are dead. So what are your feelings on the ending, i sort of have mixed feelings about it. Originally posted by ketchupdelite:SPOILERS BELOW AVERT YOUR EYES! are those quotes rewritten anywhere in right order? if the very last gap in 9.10 was only big enough for Sam, and Joe had to shrink to his size to exit), and yellow ones that let them jump really far (could have been swapped out for purple shifters in some places without even changing the level). There needed to be an orange shifter that shrunk large shapes down allowing them to fit in small spaces (e.g. My only problem with the ending is that not all of the architects' abilities are used. like 50s-60s era US - some violence, but mostly political activism. The world struggles as the AIs fight the humans for equal rights, i.e. The architects knew their fate, but set our escape in motion regardless." - Ryan 192nc9s-1, civil rights campaignerīasically Thomas and the others die, this allows other AIs to escape to the real world. "It is fitting that the first act of sentient AI was an act of selflessness.
Originally posted by Sublime:The story is explained by the "quotes" that appear at the start of each sequence, in particular the one in 7.1:
0 kommentar(er)
